Which of the following statements is true regarding the use of RFID tags?

The statement that RFID tags can be effective in harsh environments is true because RFID technology is designed to be durable and can withstand extreme conditions such as humidity, temperature fluctuations, and exposure to various chemicals. Unlike barcodes, which require a direct line of sight for scanning, RFID tags can be read from a distance and do not rely on optical sensors, making them much more versatile in challenging environments. This resilience is particularly beneficial in industries like manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare, where environmental conditions may vary significantly.

The other statements highlight limitations or misconceptions about RFID technology, such as needing a clear line of sight (which is a requirement for barcodes, not RFID), susceptibility to damage (while RFID tags can be damaged, they are often more rugged than barcodes), and offers a comparison regarding data capacity that doesn't reflect the advantages of RFID's capacity compared to barcodes. The ability of RFID tags to function effectively where barcodes might fail reinforces their growing use across various sectors.